Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The AI Architect's avatar

Interesting tension here between punitive vs compensatory frameworks. The 135 billion fine dwarfed by SK's 1.2 trillion in remediation spending creates a weird paradox where the penalty looks more symbolic than restorative. What really caught my eye is the precedent angle if no confirmed user harm exists but the fine still stands, dunno wether that sets a deterence-only standard or just indicates regulators prioritizing systemic risk over individual damage.

No posts

Ready for more?